Guwahati: An Italian missionary, who has spent 74 years in India, on Thursday marked his 98th birthday along with the golden jubilee of becoming a naturalized Indian citizen.
Fr Mario Porcu became an Indian citizen at a time when Indian government was expelling foreign missionaries from the northeastern state of Assam, recalled Fr. V.M. Thomas, president of the Conference of Religious India and head of Guwahati Salesian province.
Salesian Father Mario, as he is popularly called, was then the rector of Don Bosco School in Shillong, a prestigious institution in northeastern India.
Several senior priests and brothers from the Salesian provinces of Guwahati, Shillong, Dimapur and Calcutta provinces turned up to greet the veteran missionary at Salesian Provincial House Guwahati.
Fr Mario continues to be a much sought after ‘spiritual father’ whose office and room on the ground floor of provincial house Guwahati is always open for visitors. Bend over his old Olivetti typewriter Fr Mario is a popular confessor much before Pope Francis announced the Holy Year of Mercy starting December 8.
Government of India records estimated that there were some 5,000 foreign missionaries operating in India during mid-1960s.
Famous among foreign missionary expulsion was the case of Spanish Jesuit Father Vincent Ferrer who organized a successful agricultural cooperative in 700 villages of Manmad in Nashik district of Maharashtra.
Ferrer was expelled from India in May 1968 at the behest of right wing Hindu party Jana Sangh who had called for the expulsion of all foreign missionaries.
The Home Minister of then Congress-led Central government is claimed to have said, “Foreign missionaries already in India will be allowed to stay so long as we don’t have many things against them.”
Fr Mario was one such “harmless missionary” who became an Indian citizen in 1965.
A pioneer missionary in the Khasi and Garo Hills, as well as in the Assam plains and neighboring Buddhist kingdom of Bhutan, Fr Mario was a frontier missionary in several parts of northeast India.
Fr Mario recalls, “It was indeed a sad time for the region when all foreign missionaries were turned out of then Assam when their residential permits were allowed to lapse without renewal on expiry.”
Fr Mario recalls that many schools, dispensaries, hospitals, agricultural, industrial and other social projects had to close down or remain hopelessly understaffed until missionaries from southern India volunteered to replace the expelled missionaries.
Scores of missionaries expelled from Assam went to neighboring states of West Bengal, Orissa, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh as well as south India.
Then Chief Minister of Assam Bimala Prasad Chaliha declared that all foreign missionaries would have to leave the state in decision with the federal government’s policy, communicated in May 1967 to the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India and the National Christian Council (Protestant), that eventually all foreign missionaries in the country should be replaced by Indians.
Yet close on the heels of Chaliha’s declaration, the Press Trust of India released a statement from the Indian government that it was only the border areas from which, for security reasons, foreign missionaries would be asked to leave, and that the rest of the country would not be affected.
Church records of 1960s reveal there were 764,553 Christians in Assam with 299 foreign missionaries working in their midst. The expulsion order accordingly hit at least, a hundred Catholic missionaries, including Italian Salesian Bishop Orestes Marengo of Tezpur in Upper Assam and three of his priests whose residential permits expired in September 1968.
Charges that foreign missionaries were taking advantage of famine conditions in Bihar and elsewhere to obtain mass conversions by unlawful means were repeated in Parliament so often that Archbishop James R. Knox, the former Internuncio to India, was constrained to say in his farewell message in 1967 that the atmosphere of the Niyogi Report of 1955 was raising its ugly head in the country once again.
The report recommended the “legal prohibition” of religious conversion not “completely voluntary,” which was not implemented as it would have been “difficult to formulate and indeed to apply without violating the precepts of religious liberty enshrined in the Indian Constitution”.