New Delhi: The Syro Malabar Church is set to issue a set of guidelines instructing bishops to ensure that priests solemnizing interfaith marriages adhere strictly to the canon laws.
According to a report in the Times of India, the development came after an interfaith marriage in Ernakulam, solemnized by a bishop, triggered controversy.
The wedding of a Catholic woman and a Muslim man based in Kochi was held at the Kadavanthra St Joseph Church on November 9 and the ceremony was attended by Emeritus Bishop Mathew Vaniakizhakkel of Satna.
A photograph of the couple with the bishop, published in a newspaper, drew criticism from certain sections.
Subsequently, Cardinal George Alencherry, head of the Syro-Malabar Church, ordered an inquiry into the event and sought a report from Archbishop Antony Kariyil of Ernakulam-Angamaly.
Father Benny Maramparambil, the vicar of the church where the marriage was held, said that the ceremony was solemnized in adherence to the norms for ‘disparity of cult’ marriages, in a letter to archbishop Mar Antony Kariyil. Interfaith marriages are called ‘disparity of cult’ marriages by the church.
Father Maramparambil said that he had received a letter from the bride’s parish, the priest of Kuzhikkattussery church, stating there were no ‘impediments’ for the marriage.
However, some members of the Kerala Catholic Bishops Council (KCBC), have alleged that both the priests were flouting canon laws. “The Catholic church has written rules to be followed during such situations. The bishop of the diocese concerned has to give his approval,” said one of them, who didn’t want to be identified.
“Besides the probe ordered by Cardinal Alencherry, the Kerala Catholic Bishops’ Council will also look into the matter. After getting the report from the Ernakulam-Angamaly archbishop, we will direct the bishops to issue strict guidelines to the priests on conducting ‘disparity of cult’ marriages,” he added.
Bishop Vaniakizhakkel has since expressed regret for attending the marriage. “I attended the mixed marriage because of my close association with the bride’s family. However, I regret attending it,” says a letter from Emeritus Bishop Mathew Vaniakizhakkel of Satna.
Matters India earlier reported that the 74-year-old bishop’s “exemplary step” of expressing regret brought “great relief” to the traditional faithful in the archdiocese.
As per the report, the Church allows a Catholic to marry a member of another faith, who does not want to be baptized, only in special circumstances. Even then, such marriages are not considered sacrament even if conducted inside a church.
A group of progressive Catholics have however welcomed the bishop’s step to attend a mixed marriage.
Shaiju Antony, a convener of Archdiocesan Movement of Transparency, supported the solemnization of the inter-religious marriage and said, “it is the right of a faithful”. Antony also pointed out that several dioceses denied the provision to the faithful and said that such discrimination was not right since mixed marriage was a universally accepted practice in the Catholic Church.
Antony also rejected allegations that the Catholic girl’s family had given 1 million rupees to the church to solemnize the marriage. He said some people with vested interests were attempting to create confusion against the Church among people and were spreading false allegations via social media.
The incident comes against the backdrop of renewed promises of legislation surrounding the concept of “love jihad” – a term coined by Sangh parivar outfits to describe an imaginary Muslim conspiracy to convert unsuspecting Hindu women to Islam.
The bogey of “love jihad” has also found backing from Catholic bishops in Kerala. The synod of Syro-Malabar Church, an apex body of Catholic Bishops, has said “Love jihad is a reality” and alleged that several women from the Christian community from the southern state were being lured by the Islamic State and used in terror activities.
“There are circumstances in which Christian girls are killed in the name of love jihad in Kerala,” the Synod alleged in a statement issued.
Previously, former chief minister Oommen Chandy had claimed that 2,667 young women had converted to Islam in the state since 2006.
The Madhya Pradesh Home Minister Narottam Mishra said that a ‘love jihad bill,’ which includes five years of rigorous imprisonment for ‘violators’ and cognizable and non-bailable charges, would soon be introduced in the state assembly. The Bill will reportedly also have a provision that will make it necessary to notify the district collector a month in advance before formalizing an inter-faith marriage.
Source: thewire.in
“Sabbath is for man, and not man for Sabbath” – Jesus
A very regrettable action by the Bishop of Satna under pressure from a handful of people with vexed interests . This is a very dangerous situation. It may devrlop into a practice which may create road blocks for any xyz step. The bishop who comnented but did not wish to tell openly must show enough courage to speak openly. The practice of speaking secretly must be stopped, it is an important matter being considered. Non existent love jihad must not be created into a matter of serious concern by a few people. RSS BJP supporters and state governments is intended to prevent converdion. Christian bishops must nit become puppets religious fanatics.
What strict guidelines are they talking of drafting for bishops to keep their priests in check when dealing with such marriages when a bishop himself flouts rules! Perhaps the KCBC needs to issue guidelines and instructions on how to keep their holy bishops in check. As for the claim of the priest concerned that the marriage was solemnized in church in keeping with rules governing ‘disparity of cult’ marriage, maybe he could tell us another one, considering that his present joke doesn’t raise a laugh even as it does raise hackles.
There is no problem for the faithful if the marriage can be conducted by adhering to all rules of the Church. There is no problem for the non- faithful if the marriage is not conducted in the church. The problem is for some who love to project that they are the Canon law, Civil law, personal law and all lawlessness.
If some mistakes happened , it is for the Parish or diocese to correct it and to follow the right procedure.