New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India on December 14 issued notices to among others the federal and Kerala governments on a petition challenging the mandatory sacramental confessions practiced in the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church.
The petitioners, Mathew Mathachan and CV Jose, argued that the practice of undergoing “sacramental confession” before a priest affects human dignity and liberty of thought. They said believers have been forced to not speak against it out of fear of removal from parish membership and ostracization, Live Law reported.
A bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde had first asked advocate Sanjay Parekh to approach the High Court. However, Parekh cited Supreme Court’s September 2019 order after the KS Varghese case, prohibiting all civil courts and High Courts in Kerala from passing any judgment in violation of the mandate.
The petition raises the question of whether mandatory sacramental confession before priests violates Articles 21 (personal liberty) and 25 (freedom of religion) of the Constitution.
Mathachan and Jose said that forced and compulsory confessions from men and women have led to severe problems, including the exploitation of women and blackmailing.
“If a person has not confessed, then that person’s name will be struck off from the parish register and he/she is barred from all activities of the church,” the petition read. “If that concerned person wants to get married, he/she will have to mandatorily confess before his permitted to marry, failing which the Vicar of the Parish will not recognize him as the member of the Church as his membership in view of the non-performance of confession.”
In 2018, the Kerala High Court had dismissed a plea seeking to declare the practice of “sacramental confession” to be unconstitutional. The court had said that the practice was one of the quintessential practices of following Christianity.
The petition sought the revocation of clauses 7 and 8 in the Church’s 1934 constitution that made confession mandatory to participate in parish’s general body meetings.
Source: Live Law
Religion is meant to make people closer to God. Every religion has its own teachings and rules about their implementation. In that the Catholic Church teaches about the need to receive the Communion in the state of grace or after repentance/ confession at least once a year. People who are believers in Catholic Church follow that and others do not. The Church has no police power to implement the rule. Therefore any argument that there should not be rules is sheer meaningless and mischievous
It is time for all Christian Denominations (who have the Sacrament of Reconciliation) to do a “sincere introspection” about the way this Sacrament is practiced. It is good to do a SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat) Analysis and make “meaningful changes” in the practice.
Confession is an Voluntarily Repentance from a Christian who violated the love of God, and the love of his/her brothers and sisters in the Society. Therefore, it is an voluntary reconciliation within one’s own Sins and mending the relationships of his/her brothers and sisters in the Society. It is a conscious reconciliation in the broken relationship of horizontal and Vertical relationships. Therefore, no human freedom is violated.
The Orthodox Church needs to jettison some of its orthodoxy. Making confession mandatory and penal is absurd. They too need the aggiornamento of Vatican II.