By Varghese Alengaden

Indore: This is in reference to the article by A Pushparajan on August 5 and reactions from many others. Matters India had published my reflections a few years ago with 28 criteria for selecting bishops. These criteria are equally good for the reflection and prayer for bishops who are already holding the position.

I have been speaking and writing about the need for returning to “the way of Christ.” Drifting away from the way of Christ is the cause of all problems we face both from within and outside the church. I wish to reproduce the same reflections here:

Demand for a local/Dalit bishop is neither new nor surprising. Since many years this has become the accepted practice. We have witnessed numerous appeals sent to Vatican office by various groups, protest rallies in the streets, rebellion and even violence during the process prior to the appointment of a bishop

Even after the appointment of one after long years of negotiation the reactions and group conflicts continue to damage the image of the Church. The Church is plagued with division in the name of caste, language, rite and many other conflicts. In reality politics to capture power, privileges and money have destroyed the credibility of the Church. No one seems to be in a position to heal these division and conflicts. The Church is threatened more by internal conflicts than external anti-Christian forces.

Before we discuss about the issue of the local Dalit or tribal bishop we need to have clarity about the mission of the Church and the role of a bishop in the Church. The present disaster has its origin from the time of Roman emperors who politicized and distorted the spiritual movement of Christ. When the Church became an empire there was need for emperors to rule the people and manage its large estates.

Instead of the teachings of Christ, corporate style and rules became the deciding factor. The wealth and imperial institutions became the first concern of the church leaders who acted as their owners. In order to control people they converted the way of Christ into a cultic religion with numerous rituals and superstitious beliefs. Thus the unquestionable and unaccountable authority of leaders was perpetuated over the centuries. All kinds of corruption and scandals were covered by the political power, money and blind beliefs.

Power struggle which is part and parcel of the secular political world entered into the Church administration because of the lust for the unaccounted wealth and unquestionable authority. Hence there is the rat race for power and position as found in secular world.

There is an urgent need to formulate criteria of leadership with transparent selection process at every level of the church institutions before making claims for leadership in the name of caste, tribe, region and other considerations.

While deciding about the leadership it is important to pay attention to the criteria of leadership which Christ had set two thousand years ago. He was very crystal clear when he said that the leader should be the servant of all. There is no place for imperialism. He had clearly directed not to have any titles and ranks among his disciples and leaders. Why then we have the practice of addressing the bishops with titles like, Excellency, Grace, Eminence and Beatitude? Why do we have ranks such as bishop, archbishop, cardinal, major archbishop? Why do we construct palatial structures and royal life style for bishops and priests?

Jesus presented the leadership model of Good Shepherd who leads the sheep from the front. Calling the sheep by name means knowing everyone personally. He would be the first one to make sacrifices and risk to protect the people. He sets example by his words and deeds. There is no contraction in him.

Following the life and teachings of Jesus we shall review the office of bishop and propose some criteria by which a person could be selected to hold this important responsibility.

1. A Bishop shall have personal credibility of practicing what he preaches.
2. He shall be a person who blends contemplation and action.
3. As a leader of the diocese a bishop shall have thorough knowledge about the sociopolitical scenario of the country through regular reading and study about the developments in the country. Much of the problems the Church today faces are due to the alienation from the sociopolitical realities. A vast majority of the bishops do not have the habit of serious reading.
4. The present criteria of selecting a bishop on the basis of blind loyalty to the laws and policies imposed by the Vatican ignoring other important leadership qualities should be stopped.
5. Bishop shall consider equally responsible to all sections in the diocese and society. He should be free from all kinds of prejudice and exclusive mentality.
6. He shall have skills of communication, ability to manage crisis with maturity and intelligence.
7. Instead of being an autocrat a bishop shall practice team work, participation of all concerned in planning and decision making .
8. Bishop shall be a person with who respects women, recognize and honor their committed service by giving them equal importance in all planning and decision making process? He shall ensure the dignity and freedom of all women who are working in his diocese.
9. Instead of following the traditional routine practices he shall encourage creative ventures and experiments with the aim of producing lasting fruits.
10. In no situation he shall make any compromise on ethics and morals? Truthfulness and transparency shall be his hallmark. He shall follow zero tolerance with regard to any corrupt practices.
11. Being the leader of the diocese bishop shall never show any favoritism to any person or groups. He shall give equal opportunities and support to all groups. Promotion of pluralism of caste, tribe, language and culture shall be his policy because pluralism was the way of Christ.
12. As a follower of Christ his priority shall be making all disciples of Christ who follow His values than taking the short cut of worshiping Him. Priority shall be for the teaching of the kingdom values of justice, love, peace, fellowship, reconciliation, dialogue respecting the diversity than multiplying cultic practices and expensive celebrations.
13. Clergy, religious and laity will be educated to become the part of the larger society by integrating in to it as SALT to add flavor, prevent corruption and facilitate healing and reconciliation.
14. During the formation and later as priests and professed religious priority shall be given for education and ongoing training in professionalism, developing skills of public relations and equipping oneself through self-education through reading books, attending various courses in India.
15. The age old practice of sending priests and religious to Rome and other countries in Europe and America shall be discouraged. More importance and priority shall be given for studies in India. Bishops, his priests and religious shall be in touch with the soul of India and “smell of the sheep”.
16. Bishop shall make efforts to remove the traditional image of the Church as ‘welfare agency’ of distributing charity to propagate Christianity. Church should be transformed to be an agent of social change through its institutions and activities. Bishop shall initiate the process of educating and equipping the priests, sisters and laity to this purpose.
17. Following the instruction of prophetic Pope Francis, a bishop shall not be an ‘airport bishop’ and avoid all kinds of unproductive and unnecessary trips in India and abroad.
18. A bishop shall not go around Europe and America collecting funds like a beggar in the name of the poor people of India .He shall spend his time in the diocese with his sheep to get the “smell of the sheep” and plan programs to raise funds locally.
19. Instead of keeping a few sycophants and coterie around him bishop shall appoint competent priests, religious and experienced lay persons as in charge of various departments. He shall ensure transparency, regular evaluation and co ordination of different departments. People with intelligence, critical thinking and experience shall be made members of his core team.
20. While following the participatory style he shall be an assertive leader who will demand discipline and order from all. Today many Bishops and leaders of the congregations are helpless in getting the co operation of some VIP priests and religious. They lack competence and credibility to demand and command.
21. Bishop shall be aware of their call to be a prophet to the nations. He shall train his priests, religious and laity to be prophetic leaders and act as conscience of the society and voice of the voiceless.
22. Bishop should take the role of a facilitator among various groups and prevent conflicts in the bud and solve them through facilitating dialogue.
23. Bishop shall settle the conflicts in the spirit of the Gospel and avoid any possibility of gossips and negative publicity within the diocese or dragging the case into court and media.
24. The mark of an enlightened leader is to accept the mistakes and even apologize. There shall be no room for false ego and victimizing the critics by misuse of God-given authority.
25. To live and work as good shepherd and make right decisions a bishop should spend one full hour in contemplating on his call, vision and mission. This one hour should be purely an appointment with God and himself. This should not be filled with formal prayers and reading. This one hour appointment should be the first priority of every bishop and those who are in leadership positions.
26. The process and method of selecting a bishop need radical change. Instead of the present method of appointing a person by those who are sitting in Vatican he shall be selected through democratic way following strictly the above mentioned criteria. There shall he a transparent participation of priests, religious and laity of the diocese. What we needed is a system and process which ensure the criteria of the candidate.
27. Bishop shall organize regular evaluation meeting with priests, nuns and lay collaborators about the various ministries. The evaluation shall be based on the accepted vision, goals, policies and priories. The vision shall be formulate based on the teachings of Christ. Following the example of Christ bishop shall ask the participants questions, “Who do people say that I am? He should include the question, “who do you say that I am?”. In other words he should get feedback about himself and his leadership style. Evaluation shall be conducted in a free and fearless atmosphere. Instead of reacting over any critical remarks by any one bishop shall be humble to accept the observations promise to improve himself. The success of many secular organizations and companies is due their regular evaluation.
28 Since the post of a bishop is one of leadership anyone who fulfills the above mentioned criteria shall be selected to take up the responsibility irrespective of sex, caste and status. Let us apply the direction of Jesus to put the new wine in new wineskins. Merit based on ethics and competence should matter more than politics of number, caste and blind loyalty to those in Vatican in the selection of a bishop. Same principles can be applied to the leadership of religious congregations.

Making any one a leader without developing competence and character will be disaster. The Church is already suffering with various problems due to lack of enlightened leaders Let us neither play politics nor indulge in business with the sacred mission of Christ . Church in India has bigger challenges to face. Only a united Church can accomplish the mission of Christ.

7 Comments

  1. First of all Pope, Bishops, Fathers can never be compared to Jesus. In fact our religion today stands on the power of money, none of us want to understand this truth, but we all realize it. 0.02% clergies have been governing over big believers. Why not 50% laity should involve in process to select the Bishop? Varghese Alengaden judiciously raised the issue, hopefully he will not be forbidden from his priestly order.

  2. I didn’t feel like reading through the complete nonsense you’ve keyed in…First, Bishop Franco is only accused by a dubious character… You’ve spoken of an apostle of Christ as a wrong doer like the 2 Babylonian Judges against Susanna in the Book of Daniel. He could be guilty, if PROVED…

    YOU want biometry registers.. Who will be paid to check it??? Do you want your servant maids to check the biometry of your your entry and exit from YOUR OWN BEDROOM ??? You and I need to pray for wisdom as James the Apostle recommended…

  3. If one takes a close look at Bishops (?) Franco Mulakkal and K.A.William, they went all out in sexual predatory adventures and financial corruption, including charges of murder (K.A. William) only after becoming bishops. Bishophood gives one so much power (Most Bishops consider themselves Monarchs of all they survey), that they show their true colours only after becoming Bishops in the full blissful knowledge that they can rule the roost with impunity till they reach 75 years of age!

    Besides adhering to the screening systems suggested by Fr Verghese Alengaden, there should also be inbuilt mechanisms of checks and balances – financial and otherwise (like bar on night stays in convents) to keep Bishops/Archbishops under regular scrutiny. One might include Bio-metric entry-exit systems and also CCTV cameras in sensitive areas.

    What is most important in Christianity is all are equal in the eyes of Christ – no one is low, no one is high. So the reported practice of Dalits, Upper Castes, etc, separate queues for the Eucharist, separate burial grounds, and the demand for Dalit representation of Bishops are REDUNDANT. One cannot be a Casteist and at the same time a Christian. Bishops should be selected based on those who can give good leadership and bring up men and women from the grass-root level by transcending all narrow myopic social barriers.

  4. I shall add a few practical suggestions to the selection and appointment of bishops:
    1. Bishops should be appointed from outside the diocese.
    2. Preferance should be given to those with pastoral experience rather than degrees in Canon Law.
    3. Pope Francis is a Jesuit. It shows in his style of functioning. More religious priests who have ongoing formation should be preferred over diocesan priests whose formation stops with ordination.
    4. Bishops should be transferred every ten years and the mediaeval European practice of a Coat of Arms should be abolished.
    5. The laity should be encouraged to send their suggestions to the Nuncio. I do it every time there is a vacancy.
    6. A short list of three candidates should be published like the proclamation of banns, so that the people have an opportunity to express their objections/ observations, if any.
    There are no theological objections to my suggestions aforementioned.

  5. ‘Criteria to b a Bishop’ suggested by an a senior priest in pastoral field with rich experience is indeed very prophetic. All d points suggested r d accepted norms in d choice of Bishop. However, there is a saying that these May fall as ‘water on Duck’s back’. Fr Verguese Alengaden had already pointed out 28 criteria to b bishop in Matters India few years ago. And still d way to appoint Bishops hv not changed much. D disease of casteism , parochialism n communalism continues. It’s d crocodiles skin that prevents listening to such criteria. Just dwelling on No 19 criteria Church leadership pattern can definitely change. Trusting our Laity in d process to appoint Bishops, keeping transparency in d matter through democratic process n to do away with oiling n buttering will help in keeping d image of Jesus d Good Shepherd n His Church . D kingdom of Justice , equality , dignity n peace! Thanks to Fr Alengaden to enlighten all through his prophetic voice on d matter of concern.

  6. Must thank Varghese Alegadan for that detailed response. If applied to incumbents today, a full half will fail. But contemporary times and conditions demand a rigorous process choosing a Bishop. If he represents the diocese’s ethnic and cultural communities, it is good. But selection must be made from the larger pool of the entire country, ur at least. the region.
    The one point I could add would be Zero Tolerance to sexual or financial crimes.

  7. Most importantly, the person to be elected as a bishop has to understand, teach and follow the theology of Christ and not the theology of the church as the church has drifted very far away from Christ and His practical theology.

Comments are closed.