Patna: Bihar has had the highest number of hate speech incidents from 2014 to 2018, says a study by law students.
Uttar Pradesh and Telangana took the second and third spot while the leaders of the National Democratic Alliance contributed to the highest number of hate speeches during the period.
Over 78 percent of the total hate speech incidences reported from across the country were by the leaders of Bharatiya Janata Party in 2017. The BJP’s share in hate speeches has risen over the years – 21 percent in 2014, 45 percent in 2015, and 58 percent in 2016, according to the students.
The students said a comparative study of hate speeches at the time of state elections during the past four years reveals factors behind the victorious track record of the BJP in Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh.
The study found that during Bihar Assembly elections in 2015, the BJP leaders sought people’s votes by making caste- and religion-based remarks on 14 occasions – 45 percent of the total hate speeches in that year in the state. The RJD contributed 29 per cent of the hate speeches and grabbed second position in seeking votes through caste-based politics.
The JDU-led by Nitish Kumar has the cleanest track record among all political parties in Bihar in not mixing religion with politics.
The survey team comprised Swaraj Siddhant, a second-year law student of Chanakya National Law University Patna, Supriya Kumari, a second-year student at ICFAI University, Dehradun, and Aditya Bharadwaj, a second-year student of the same course at Indraprastha University in New Delhi.
They conducted the study under the aegis of the People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL), Bihar, a human rights body.
Praveen Kumar Madhu, general secretary, PUCL, said: “Incidents of lynching and communal violence are plaguing the country because our political leaders resort to inciting casteist, religious and ethnic passions in people.”
He added that the students used media reports to study the number of hate speech incidents from 2014 to 2018.
Asked what motivated them to examine the use of hate speech to derive electoral benefits, the law interns told The Telegraph that acknowledging the influence of vitriolic remarks on the political behavior of the masses persuaded them to examine the issue in a scientific manner.
Their internship at PUCL for a month will end on July 31.